Hemphill v. Godinez et al
Demetrius Hemphill |
S A Godinez, . Pfister, . Pierce, . Wheats, . Shull, . Punke, . Charden, . Creech and . Winemiller |
1:2014cv01475 |
December 16, 2014 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Peoria Office |
Livingston |
Jonathan E. Hawley |
Michael M. Mihm |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 107 ORDER AND OPINION denying 103 Motion for New Trial Pursuant to FRCP 59. Entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 5/1/2019. (RK, ilcd) |
Filing 7 MERIT REVIEW ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 3/23/15. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1. This case shall proceed solely on the federal claim(s) identified herein. Any claims not identified will not be included in the case, except in the Court 39;s discretion upon motion by a party for good cause shown, or by leave of court pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. Defendants Godinez, Pierce and Pfister are DISMISSED. 2. Plaintiffs Motion for Status 6 is rendered MOOT by the entry of this Merit Review Order. 3. The Court finds that sending correspondence to only two law firms does not represent a good faith effort on Plaintiffs part. 5 is DENIED. 4. The Clerk is directed to send to each Defendant pursuant to this District's internal procedures: 1) a Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service; 2) a Waiver of Service; 3) a copy of the Complaint; and 4) a copy of this Order. (Rule 16 Deadline 5/22/2015.) (See Full Written Order).(VP, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.