Robinson v. Pfister et al
Kevin Devon Robinson |
Randy Pfister, Kendra Wolf, Debbie Knauer, S.A. Godinez and Terri Anderson |
1:2015cv01093 |
March 4, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Peoria Office |
Livingston |
Sue E. Myerscough |
Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 73 OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 7/6/2017. Plaintiff's motions for counsel are denied, d/e's 69 and 71 . Defendant Pfister's motion for summary judgment is granted, d/e 63 . Defendant Pfister is terminated. The sol e remaining claim is Plaintiff's excessive force claim against Defendants Tovrea, Skeens and Blackard. The case is referred to the Magistrate Judge to conduct a settlement conference. If no settlement is reached, a conference will be scheduled to schedule the final pretrial and trial dates. (MAS, ilcd) |
Filing 9 MERIT REVIEW OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 9/10/2015. Pursuant to its merit review of the Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court finds that the Plaintiff states Eighth Amendment claims for failure to protect, excessive forc e, and inhumane conditions of confinement. This case is now in the process of service. The clerk is directed to attempt service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures. The clerk is further directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. (MAS, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.