Butler v. Deal et al
| Kendrick Butler |
| Adam Deal and Jaculynn Lane |
| 1:2015cv01102 |
| March 12, 2015 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Livingston |
| Joe Billy McDade |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
ORDER & OPINION entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 7/30/2018. For the reasons stated above, Officer Deal's Motion for Summary Judgment 74 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. See full written Order. (VH, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 3/20/2018. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED:1. Defendant's motion to vacate the settlement conference 60 is GRANTED. Accordingly, the March 26, 2018 settlement conference before United States Magistrate Jud ge Jonathan Hawley is VACATED. 2.Plaintiff's objection to the Court's March 6, 2018 Order allowing the University of Illinois law students to withdraw their representation of Plaintiff 61 is OVERRULED and DENIED. 3.Plaintiff's motion to compel 62 is DENIED. However, Loren Jones and Arthur Haynes, II are ordered to produce whatever discovery and other material that they have to Plaintiff pursuant to the clinic's rules and procedures. The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward a copy of this Order to the legal clinic so that the students can comply. 4.Plaintiff's motion to change venue 63 is DENIED. See full written Order.(VH, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
