Johnson v. Pyle et al
| Michael Johnson |
| Jacob Pyle, Christopher Leipold, John Zook, John, Edward Vilt, Kevin DeLong, Brian Schmeltz, Andrea Moss, Shawn Trainor, Terry, Orange Crush Tactical Team Member #1, Orange Crush Tactical Team Member #2, Orange Crush Tactical Team Member #3, Orange Crush Tactical Team Member #4, Orange Crush Tactical Team Member #5 and Orange Crush Tactical Team Member #6 |
| 1:2015cv01326 |
| August 7, 2015 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Livingston |
| Sara Darrow |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
MERIT REVIEW OPINION - Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 11/3/2015. Rule 16 Deadline 1/4/2016. Pursuant to its merit review of the Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the court finds that the plaintiff states a claim for excessive force agains t defendants Jacob Pyle, Christopher Leipold, John Zook, and six Orange Crush Tactical Team members, and a claim for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need against defendants Edward Vilt, Kevin DeLong, Brian Schmeltz, Andrea Moss, Shawn Tr ainor, Nurse Terry and Nurse John, all in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The clerk is directed to attempt service on the defendants pursuant to the standard procedures. (LN, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
