PNC Bank, National Association, successor to National City Bank, Successor to National City Bank of Michigan/Illinois, N.A. v. Bohannan Medical Distributors, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: PNC Bank, National Association, successor to National City Bank, Successor to National City Bank of Michigan/Illinois, N.A.
Defendant: Bohannan Medical Distributors, Inc., Cheryl L. Bohannan and Tommy G. Bohannan
Case Number: 1:2015cv01417
Filed: October 2, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Peoria Office
County: Adams
Presiding Judge: Jonathan E. Hawley
Presiding Judge: James E. Shadid
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER AND OPINION entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 11/4/2016: IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion 49 to Amend/Correct Order is Granted. Plaintiff's 50 for Attorney Fees and Court Costs is Granted in Part. An amended judgment will be entered in the amount of $247,281.78. (SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER AND OPINION.) (JRK, ilcd)
September 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER & OPINION entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 9/30/2016: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion 38 for Summary Judgment is Granted. This matter is now terminated. (SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER & OPINION) (JRK, ilcd)
June 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER AND OPINION entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 6/15/2016: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion 16 for Summary Judgment is Granted against all Defendants as it relates to liability under the Note, and Denied against all Defendants as it relates to liability under the Credit Card Agreement. Defendants' Motion 23 to Continue is Granted as it relates to the Credit Card Agreement. (SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER AND OPINION) (JRK, ilcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PNC Bank, National Association, successor to National City Bank, Successor to National City Bank of Michigan/Illinois, N.A. v. Bohannan Medical Distributors, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PNC Bank, National Association, successor to National City Bank, Successor to National City Bank of Michigan/Illinois, N.A.
Represented By: Matthew L Hendricksen
Represented By: John F. Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bohannan Medical Distributors, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cheryl L. Bohannan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tommy G. Bohannan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?