Bailey et al v. OSF Healthcare System et al
| Bonnie Bailey and Peggy Wise |
| OSF Healthcare System and The OSF Retirement Savings Plan Committee |
| 1:2016cv01137 |
| May 3, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Peoria |
| Sara Darrow |
| Jonathan E. Hawley |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
ORDER entered by Judge Sara Darrow on September 28, 2017. Plaintiffs' 62 motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The motions for leave to file a 68 reply and a 69 sur-reply are DENIED. Other 52 53 55 56 58 pending motions are MOOT. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close the case. (SC, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER entered by Judge Sara Darrow on MArch 23, 2017. Plaintiffs' 17 motion for an order designating interim class counsel is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; proposed intervenors Kasandra Anton and Sheilar Smith's 23 motion to intervene is G RANTED as specified herein; their 25 motion to transfer this case to the Southern District of Illinois is DENIED; their 33 motion for leave to file a reply to the responses thereto is GRANTED; Defendants' 34 motion for a hearing on the motions to intervene and transfer is DENIED; and Plaintiffs' 44 motion to file a notice of supplemental information is GRANTED. (SC, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
