Atwater v. McLean County Orthopedics, Ltd. et al
| John Atwater |
| McLean County Orthopedics, Ltd., Joseph A. Novotny, Craig W. Carmichael, Mark Hanson, Jerome W. Oakey, Joseph B Norris and Joseph Newcomer |
| 1:2016cv01217 |
| June 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| McLean |
| Sara Darrow |
| Jonathan E. Hawley |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley: MCO's 50 Motion for Summary Judgment on Count II is GRATNED; 63 Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts I and II is MOOT; and Atwater's 75 Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts I and II is DENIED. The only claim remaining in this case is MCO's counterclaim 76 . Entered on 8/21/18. (WG, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER entered by Judge Sara Darrow on August 15, 2017. The 35 motion to dismiss is DENIED. (SC, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER entered by Judge Sara Darrow on December 22, 2016. Defendants' 26 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and Count II of Plaintiff Atwater's 24 Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendants' earlier 18 motion to dismiss, and Plaintiff Atwater's 21 motion for an extension of time to respond to that motion, are MOOT. If Atwater wishes to amend his complaint as specified herein, he should do so by January 12, 2017. (SC, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
