Carter v. Melvin et al
| Jonathan T. Carter |
| Michael Melvin, Riliwan Ojelade, Andrew Tilden, Cheryl Hansen, Scott Punke, Susan Prentice, Jessica Clice, Tracie Klellesuik, Rachelle Caldwell, Kristi Eshelemen, Cirttia W., Andrea Moss and Kelly Haag |
| 1:2017cv01110 |
| March 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Randolph |
| Sara Darrow |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
MERIT REVIEW OPINION (Rule 16 Deadline 11/14/2017) - Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 9/15/2017. Plaintiff's motion to amend complaint 15 is granted. Clerk is directed to docket the amended complaint attached to plaintiff's motion. T he clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The clerk is directed to terminate Defendants Melvin, Punke, Prentice, Clice, Klellesuik, Caldwell, Eshelemen, Cirttia W., Moss, and Haag. The clerk is directed to attempt service on the remaining defendants pursuant to the standard procedures. Plaintiff's motion 4 is denied with leave to renew. Plaintiff's motion 18 is denied. Plaintiff's motions for status 17 20 are granted. Plaintiff's motions to compel 19 21 are denied.(LN, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
