Medrano v. Melvin et al
| Jose Medrano |
| Michael Melvin, John Baldwin, Donald Stolworthy, Randy Pfister, Guy Pierce, Annabelle Motteler, Kimberley Kelly, Emily Ruskin, . Blackard, . Wheat, . French, Patrick Keane, Andrew Tilden, M.D., Arthur Funk, Sharon Simpson, K. Sandlin, . Calmes, . Demattia, Louis Shicker, . Todd, . Caruso, . Tracy, Diane Pouk, L. McCarty, T. Arroyo, . Bennet and Wexford Health Sources Inc. |
| 1:2017cv01157 |
| April 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Livingston |
| James E. Shadid |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
MERIT REVIEW AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 10/12/2018. IT IS ORDERED:1) Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint is granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. 16 2) Base d on a review of the second amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§1915A, the Court finds the amended complaint is a violation of Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and is dismissed. 3) If Plaintiff wishes to pursue this litigation, he must provide short and plain responses to the six questions proposed by the Court in this order. Plaintiff must file his written responses to the six questions within 21 days or on or before November 2, 2018. 4) If Plaintiff ignores this Court or der, and fails to provide a specific response to each of the six questions, his case will be dismissed. If Plaintiff does not file a response to the six questions within 21 days or on or before November 2, 2018, his case will be dismissed. The Court will not consider additional motions to continue without good cause shown. 5) Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is denied with leave to renewonce he clarifies his allegations. 17 6) The Clerk of the Court is to reset the merit review deadline within 21 days of this order. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER.(SAG, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
12
MERIT REVIEW AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 4/3/2018. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1) Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint is granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. 10 2) Based on a review of the amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915A, the Court finds the amended complaint is a violation of Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and is dismissed. 2) The Court will allow the Plaintiff one FINAL opportunity to amend his complaint. The second amended complaint MUST follow the specific directions followed in this order, and must be filed within 21 days or on or before April 24, 2018. If Plaintiff does not follow the Court's directions or does not file his amended complaint by the April 24, 2018 deadline, this case will be dismissed. 3) The Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is denied with leave to renew once he clarifies his allegations. 11 4) The Clerk of the Court is to provide Plaintiff with a blank complaint form and reset the internal merit review deadline within 21 days of this order. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER.(SAG, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
8
MERIT REVIEW AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 10/5/2017. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1) Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed as a violation of Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 8. 2) P laintiff must file an amended complaint in compliance with this order within 21 days or on or before October 26, 2017. If Plaintiff fails to file his amended complaint by the deadline, his case will be dismissed. 3) The Clerk of the Court is to provi de Plaintiff with a blank complaint form. The Clerk must also reset the internal merit review deadline within 21 days of this order. 4) Plaintiff's motions for a status update are denied as moot. 6 , 7 . Plaintiff is admonished he must not file repetitive motions with the Court. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER.(SAG, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
