Holmes v. Lochard et al
| Montrell Holmes |
| Dr Lochard, Edna Greenhagen, Bartlett, Osmundson and Wexford Health Sources Inc |
| 1:2017cv01160 |
| April 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Fulton |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
OPINION: Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted. (d/e 53 .) The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. All pending motions are denied as moot, and this case is closed, with th e parties to bear their own costs. All deadlines and settings on the Court's calendar are vacated. If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this judgment, he must file a notice of appeal with this Court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). (SEE WRITTEN OPINION.) Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 11/6/2018. (GL, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
6
MERIT REVIEW OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 5/9/2017. Pursuant to its merit review of the Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court finds that Plaintiff states an Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to his serious medical need. This case is now in the process of service. HIPAA Order to enter. Rule 16 Deadline set for 7/10/2017.(MAS, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
