Long v. Tilden et al
| Lawrence Long |
| Andrew Tilden, Arthur Funk, Mary Grennan, Steve Meeks, Wexford Health Sources, Inc and Michael P Melvin |
| 1:2017cv01247 |
| May 31, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Livingston |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
MERIT REVIEW OPINION: Pursuant to its merit review of the Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court finds that Plaintiff states the following constitutional claims: Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to his serious medical ne eds; Eighth Amendment claim for inhumane conditions of confinement in the observation cell; and, a First Amendment retaliation claim based on Plaintiff's complaints for proper medical care. The clerk is directed to attempt service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures. The clerk is directed to email Plaintiff's complaint and this order to Attorney Doug Bitner. The Clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. By June 30, 2017, Defendants are directed to respond to Plaintiff's request in his complaint for a preliminary injunction. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 6/6/2017. (MJC, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
