Donley v. Hammers et al
| Bob Donley |
| Justin Hammers, Baca, . Hanlin, Bleeker, Hammand, Johnson, Meyers, Drew Meyers, Robbie Johnson and Ryan Williams |
| 1:2017cv01343 |
| July 24, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Fulton |
| Sara Darrow |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
MERIT REVIEW OPINION Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 2/5/2018. See written Order.Plaintiffs motion to amend complaint (#11) is granted.Clerk is directed to docket the amended complaint attached toplaintiffs motion. The clerk is directed to ente r the standard qualifiedprotective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability andAccountability Act. The clerk is directed to terminate Defendants Baca,Johnson, Meyers, Drew Meyers, and Robbie Johnson.The clerk is directed to attempt service on the defendantspursuant to the standard procedures.Plaintiffs motions 10 13 seeking a status of this caseare denied as moot. (ED, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
9
MERIT REVIEW OPINION - Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 9/5/2017. The plaintiff's complaint is hereby dismissed with leave to plead over. The plaintiff may file an amended complaint, within thirty (30) days of this order that complies with the Courts instructions above. In short, plead more facts. If the plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint or follow the courts specific instructions, as outlined in this order, his case may be dismissed. The clerk is directed to provide the plaintiff with a blank complaint form to assist him. Plaintiff's motion for counsel 5 is denied, with leave to renew after plaintiff has filed his amended complaint and upon demonstrating that he made attempts to hire his own counsel. Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). Plaintiff included a list of attorneys to whom he alleges he sent requests for representation. A plaintiff, however, usually shows he made an attempt to obtain counsel by writing to several lawyers and attaching the responses. Plaintiff has not done that. If Plaintiff renews his motion, he should set forth how far he has gone in school, any jobs he has held inside and outside of prison, any classes he has taken in prison, and any prior litigation experience he has. Plaintiff's motion to request criminal charges 8 is denied. The court does not have the authority to bring criminal charges against any individual. (LN, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
