Williams v. Wexford Health Services et al
| Shelby S Williams |
| Wexford Health Services, Illinois Department of Corrections, Baldwin, Lasek, Brian Biros, Andrew Tilden and Micheal Melvin |
| 1:2017cv01400 |
| September 1, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Livingston |
| Sara Darrow |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
MERIT REVIEW OPINION - Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 10/19/2017. (Rule 16 Deadline 12/18/2017.) The clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The clerk is directed to terminate Illinois Department of Corrections, Director Baldwin, and Michael Melvin as defendants. The clerk is directed to attempt service on the remaining defendants pursuant to the standard procedures. Plaintiff's motion for counsel 2 is taken under advisement. Plaintiff's motion for counsel 7 is denied as being duplicative. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 8 is MOOT. Plaintiff was previously granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See Text Order dated 9/08/2017. Plaintiff's motion for status 11 is also denied as MOOT with the entry of this order. (LN, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
