Samuell v. Standard et al
| Timothy Samuell |
| Jeff Standard, Tim Harper, Fulton County Sheriff's Medical Department, Fulton County Sheriff's Department and Unknown |
| 1:2018cv01060 |
| February 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Fulton |
| James E. Shadid |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
MERIT REVIEW ORDER entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 11/14/2018. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1) Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend is granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. 12 . 2) Pursuant to the Court's review o f Plaintiff's amended complaint, any claims relevant to November 24, 2015 are barred by the two year statute of limitations period. Therefore, Plaintiff's case is dismissed in its entirety. 3) Plaintiff has paid the filing fee in full. No further deductions should be taken for payment of the initial filing fee. 4) If the Plaintiff wishes to appeal this dismissal, he may file a notice of appeal with this court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). A motion f or leave to appeal in forma pauperis MUST set forth the issues the Plaintiff plans to present on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(C). If the Plaintiff does choose to appeal, he will be liable for the $505 appellate filing fee irrespective of the outcome of the appeal. See full written Order.(VH, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
