Peters v. Sloan et al
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Peters
Defendant: Timothy Sloan, David M Erickson and Cassandra Haller
Case Number: 1:2018cv01236
Filed: June 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Peoria Office
County: McLean
Presiding Judge: Jonathan E Hawley
Referring Judge: James E Shadid
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2018 Filing 15 RESPONSE to Motion re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) filed by Plaintiff Elizabeth Peters. (Peters, Elizabeth)
August 22, 2018 Filing 14 RESPONSE to Motion re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) filed by Plaintiff Elizabeth Peters. (Peters, Elizabeth)
August 9, 2018 Filing 13 RULE 56 NOTICE entered re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) (SAG, ilcd)
August 9, 2018 Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) by Defendant David M Erickson. Responses due by 8/23/2018 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit of David M. Erickson in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 David M. Erickson's Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss)(Jannes, Christopher)
August 2, 2018 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER denying #11 the Plaintiff's Motion for Issuance of Subpoena. First, the Subpoena lacks complete information as to Defendant Cassandra Haller. Second, the subpoena is one to appear and testify at a hearing or trial in a civil action. This case has no hearings or trial set. Third, the language the Plaintiff included in her subpoena incorrectly refers to this case as a criminal case. Fourth, all Defendants have not yet appeared in this case. Finally, no discovery schedule has yet been set in this case and so the Plaintiff's request for subpoenas to issue is premature. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 8/2/2018. (KZ, ilcd)
August 1, 2018 Filing 11 MOTION for Issuance of Subpoena (blank Subpoena form sent via FedX to Clerk's office) by Plaintiff Elizabeth Peters. Responses due by 8/15/2018 (FDS, ilcd)
July 31, 2018 Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service , filed by Elizabeth Peters. (Peters, Elizabeth)
July 31, 2018 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 7/31/2018. The Plaintiff filed what is purported to be an Affidavit of Service #7 for affidavit served on Cassandra Haller on 7/24/2018. The affidavit of service is illegible. The clerk is directed to strike document #7 . The Plaintiff is directed to file a legible copy of that affidavit of service by 8/7/2018.(VH, ilcd)
July 30, 2018 Filing 9 ANSWER to #5 Amended Complaint by Cassandra Haller.(JRK, ilcd)
July 28, 2018 Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT by Elizabeth Peters. (Peters, Elizabeth)
July 28, 2018 Filing 7 STRICKEN PURSUANT TO TEXT ORDER ENTERED ON 7/31/2018-AFFIDAVIT of Service for affidavit served on Cassandra Haller on 07/24/2018, filed by Elizabeth Peters. (Peters, Elizabeth) Modified on 7/31/2018 (VH, ilcd).
July 10, 2018 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (SAG, ilcd)
July 5, 2018 Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Elizabeth Peters.(SAG, ilcd)
July 2, 2018 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion for an ECF user ID and Password. Clerk is directed to contact plaintiff and provide the credentials for ECF. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 7/2/18. (WG, ilcd)
June 29, 2018 Filing 4 +++ SEALED DOCUMENT - ORIGINAL MOTION FOR ELECTRONIC FILING UNREDACTED (SAG, ilcd)
June 29, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION for Electronic Filing by Plaintiff Elizabeth Peters. Responses due by 7/13/2018 (SAG, ilcd)
June 28, 2018 Set/Reset Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 7/11/2018. (JS, ilcd)
June 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER re Jurisdiction. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 6/27/2018. (KZ, ilcd)
June 26, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400, receipt #14626032284.), filed by Elizabeth Peters.(VH, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peters v. Sloan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy Sloan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David M Erickson
Represented By: Christopher P Jannes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cassandra Haller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Peters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?