Reaves v. Kallis
| Denny Delano Reaves and Danny Delano Reaves |
| Steve Kallis |
| 1:2018cv01261 |
| July 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Tazewell |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Michael M Mihm |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ONLY ORDER REASSIGNING CASE: This case reassigned to Judge Michael M. Mihm for further proceedings. All dates to remain as previously scheduled. Entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 8/23/2018. (MC, ilcd)
|
| Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number 14626032491. (JS, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Danny Delano Reaves. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(KE, ilcd) Modified on 7/26/2018 to correct plaintiff's first name (KM, ilcd). |
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 7/16/2018 directing the Petitioner to pay the filing fee of $5.00 within 30 days of this Order. If Petitioner is unable to pay the required filing fee, he may file a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. If Petitioner fails to pay the required filing fee or file a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis within 30 days, his Petition under 28 U.S.C. Sec 2241 for Writ of Habeas #1 will be dismissed without prejudice by this court. (Prisoner Prepayment due by 8/15/2018) (KE, ilcd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
