Mid Central Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund v. Neidig Excavating, Inc.
Mid Central Operating Engineers Health and Welfare and Mid Central Operating Engineers Health & Welfare Fund |
Neidig Excavating, Inc. |
1:2018cv01337 |
September 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Jonathan E Hawley |
Michael M Mihm |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Mid Central Operating Engineers Health & Welfare Fund re #4 MOTION for Default Judgment (Stuckel, David) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Default Judgment by Plaintiff Mid Central Operating Engineers Health & Welfare Fund. Responses due by 11/21/2018 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Cheryl Cotrrell, #2 Affidavit of David W. Stuckel)(Stuckel, David) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mid Central Operating Engineers Health & Welfare Fund. Neidig Excavating, Inc. served on 10/9/2018, answer due 10/30/2018. (Stuckel, David) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Neidig Excavating, Inc. (SAG, ilcd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Neidig Excavating, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0753-2929651.), filed by Mid Central Operating Engineers Health and Welfare. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Stuckel, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.