It v. Unknown Officer et al
| Anthony K It |
| Unknown Nurse Manager, Unknown Police Chief, Unknown Hospital, Unknown Officer, City of Chenoa, Unknown Hospital Corporation Group and Unknown Nurse |
| 1:2018cv01357 |
| October 1, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Jonathan E Hawley |
| James E Shadid |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 JUDGMENT entered in a civil case (SAG, ilcd) |
Filing 8
ORDER entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 10/25/2018. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint #7 is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim; 2. Plaintiff is ASSESSED a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g); 3. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis #2 is DENIED; 4. Plaintiff remains responsible for the full filing fee in this case, and the institution having custody of Plaintiff is DIRECTED to remit 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the $400 filing fee is paid. 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). 5. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the case. SEE WRITTEN ORDER.(SAG, ilcd)
|
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Anthony K It.(SAG, ilcd) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/31/2018. (FDS, ilcd) |
|
TEXT ONLY ORDER: In light of the Plaintiff's Letter #6 , the Court sua sponte extends the deadline to file an amended complaint to 10/31/2018. The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this order to Plaintiff. Entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 10/18/2018. (SJP, ilcd)
|
| Filing 6 Letter from Anthony K It (SAG, ilcd) |
| Filing 5 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER. (SAG, ilcd) |
| Filing 4 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER. (SAG, ilcd) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/17/2018. (FDS, ilcd) |
|
TEXT ONLY ORDER: Plaintiff has filed a complaint #1 that is largely unreadable. The Court therefore directs Plaintiff to file an amended complaint that is legible within 14 days of this Order. The Court notes that Plaintiff has checked the box on the complaint form indicating that he has not brought any other lawsuit in state or federal court dealing with the same facts involved in this case. Although his complaint is largely illegible, the Court notes that it can decipher the first line of his claim, which starts with the date of September 21, 2013. That is the same date alleged in Plaintiffs prior case in this district, and appears to be against the same defendants. If the Court finds that the allegations in Plaintiffs re-filed complaint are in fact an attempt to relitigate the dismissal of Plaintiffs prior lawsuit in this district, Case No. 17-1561, the Court will summarily dismiss this action with prejudice and assess a strike against Plaintiff for filing a frivolous or malicious lawsuit. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If no amended complaint is filed within 14 days of this order, this case will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 10/3/2018. (SJP, ilcd)
|
| Filing 3 Letter from Clerk of Court to Columbia Correctional Institution requesting trust fund ledgers 4/2/18-10/2/18. (SAG, ilcd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Anthony K It. Responses due by 10/15/2018 (SAG, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Anthony K It.(SAG, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
