Sigler v. GEICO Casualty Co. et al
Nathan Sigler |
GEICO Casualty Co., Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Co. and GEICO General Insurance Co. |
1:2018cv01446 |
December 14, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Jonathan E Hawley |
Michael M Mihm |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Jacob Lawrence Phillips on behalf of Nathan Sigler (Phillips, Jacob) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Edmund Alonso Normand on behalf of Nathan Sigler (Normand, Edmund) |
TEXT ORDER denying #11 Motion to allow attorney Kymberly Kochis to be admitted pro hoc vice and designated as lead trial counsel for the Defendants. Local Rule 83.5(F) provides that an attorney may only seek pro hoc vice admission "while his or her application for admission to practice in the Central District of Illinois is pending." Moreover, "the application must be submitted contemporaneously with the motion for leave." The motion does not indicate that Ms. Kochis either intends to seek admission in this District or that her application was submitted contemporaneously with the motion. Accordingly, the motion is DENIED, with leave to renew upon compliance with Local Rule 83.5(F). Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 1/29/2019. (Hawley, Jonathan) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for Kymberly Kochis by Defendants GEICO Casualty Co., GEICO General Insurance Co., GEICO Indemnity Co., Government Employees Insurance Company. Responses due by 2/11/2019 (TeBeest, Seth) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Seth Andrew TeBeest on behalf of GEICO Casualty Co., GEICO General Insurance Co., GEICO Indemnity Co., Government Employees Insurance Company (TeBeest, Seth) |
TEXT ORDER granting unopposed #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Defendants GEICO Casualty Co., GEICO General Insurance Co., GEICO Indemnity Co. and Government Employees Insurance Company shall file their answer by 2/12/2019. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 1/18/19. (WG, ilcd) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Defendants GEICO Casualty Co., GEICO General Insurance Co., GEICO Indemnity Co., Government Employees Insurance Company. Responses due by 1/22/2019 (Heil, John) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by John P Heil, Jr on behalf of GEICO Casualty Co., GEICO General Insurance Co., GEICO Indemnity Co., Government Employees Insurance Company (Heil, John) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Adam J Levitt on behalf of Nathan Sigler (Levitt, Adam) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (SAG, ilcd) |
TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion. Clerk is directed to issue summons and return to plaintiff's counsel for service. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 12/17/18. (WG, ilcd) |
Filing 5 Exhibit re #1 Complaint Exhibit B to Complaint by Nathan Sigler. (Brown, Joel) |
Filing 4 Exhibit re #1 Complaint Exhibit A to Complaint by Nathan Sigler. (Brown, Joel) |
Filing 3 MOTION Request for Summons to Issue As To All Defendants by Plaintiff Nathan Sigler. Responses due by 12/28/2018 (Brown, Joel) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST pursuant to Local Rule 11.3 by Nathan Sigler. (Brown, Joel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Class Action Complaint against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0753-2995301.), filed by Nathan Sigler. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Brown, Joel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.