Waters v. Eagle Recovery Associates, Inc. et al
Heather Waters |
DOES 1-10, inclusive and Eagle Recovery Associates, Inc. |
1:2018cv01459 |
December 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Jonathan E Hawley |
Joe Billy McDade |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Sean Gifford Rohan on behalf of Eagle Recovery Associates, Inc. (Rohan, Sean) |
TEXT ORDER granting Unopposed #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant Eagle Recovery Associates, Inc. answer due 3/7/2019. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 2/6/19. (WG, ilcd) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Eagle Recovery Associates, Inc.. Responses due by 2/19/2019 (Rubey, Christopher) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Christopher Patrick Rubey on behalf of Eagle Recovery Associates, Inc. (Rubey, Christopher) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Heather Waters. Eagle Recovery Associates, Inc. served on 1/15/2019, answer due 2/5/2019. (Lemberg, Sergei) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Eagle Recovery Associates, Inc.. (JS, ilcd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DOES 1-10, inclusive, Eagle Recovery Associates, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0753-3000748.), filed by Heather Waters. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Lemberg, Sergei) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.