Wilson v. Credence Resource Management, LLC
Satterria A. Wilson |
Credence Resource Management, LLC |
1:2019cv01056 |
February 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Jonathan E Hawley |
Joe Billy McDade |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 TEXT ORDER: This case is set for a Rule 16 scheduling conference before Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on Friday, 5/10/19 at 9:30 AM via telephone (Court to set up the call). If Counsel are to be reached at a number different than what is listed on the docket sheet, they are directed to phone Judge Hawley's courtroom deputy at 309-671-7117 and confirm the phone number where they may be reached for the call. A discovery plan pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(3) shall be filed on or before 5/7/2019. The parties may, but are not required to, follow the format of the sample discovery plan set forth as Attachment A to the standing order attached to this text order. The Discovery Plan event may be found in the CM/ECF system within the other Documents category. All counsel must read and be familiar with the standing order attached to this text order prior to their Rule 26(f) planning meeting. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 4/9/2019. (WG, ilcd) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST pursuant to Local Rule 11.3 by Credence Resource Management, LLC. (Cunningham, Andrew) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Credence Resource Management, LLC.(Cunningham, Andrew) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Andrew Edward Cunningham on behalf of Credence Resource Management, LLC (Cunningham, Andrew) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Morgan Ian Marcus on behalf of Credence Resource Management, LLC (Marcus, Morgan) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Satterria A. Wilson. Credence Resource Management, LLC served on 3/18/2019, answer due 4/8/2019. (Volheim, Nathan) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Credence Resource Management, LLC. (SAG, ilcd) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Nathan Charles Volheim on behalf of Satterria A. Wilson (Volheim, Nathan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Credence Resource Management, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0753-3043584.), filed by Satterria A. Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Volheim, Nathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wilson v. Credence Resource Management, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Credence Resource Management, LLC | |
Represented By: | Morgan Ian Marcus |
Represented By: | Andrew Edward Cunningham |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Satterria A. Wilson | |
Represented By: | Nathan Charles Volheim |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.