Jackson v. Hansen et al
Plaintiff: Roosevelt Jackson
Defendant: Nurse Practitioner C. Hansen and A. Tilden
Case Number: 1:2019cv01123
Filed: April 10, 2019
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Colin Stirling Bruce
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 HIPAA QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 6/10/2019. (ED, ilcd)
June 10, 2019 Filing 10 REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit for both defendants sent to Pontiac on 6/10/2019. (ED, ilcd)
June 10, 2019 Filing 9 MERIT REVIEW OPINION Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 6/10/2019. See written Order. It is therefore ordered: Pursuant to its merit review of the Complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915A, the court finds that the plaintiff states deliberate indifference to a serious medical need against Defendants Hansen and Tilden. This case is now in the process of service. The court will attempt service on the defendants by mailing each defendant a waiver of service. The defendants have 60 days from the date the waiver is sent to file an answer. The clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The clerk is directed to attempt service on Defendants Hansen and Tilden pursuant to the standard procedures. Plaintiffs Corrected Petition to Proceed in forma pauperis #6 is granted to the extent that Plaintiff desires to update the Court on his financial situation and denied as moot as to any other relief requested. (ED, ilcd)
May 23, 2019 Filing 8 PDF with attached Audio File. Court Date & Time [ 5/23/2019 10:29:06 AM ]. File Size [ 1104 KB ]. Run Time [ 00:02:18 ]. (admin).
May 23, 2019 Minute Entry for proceedings held 5/23/19 before Judge Harold A. Baker. Appearance by Plaintiff Roosevelt Jackson. Merit Review Hearing held by telephone. Allegations of the Complaint discussed. Written order to be entered. (Tape #UR-C 10:29 AM.) (TC, ilcd)
May 15, 2019 Prisoner Initial Partial Filing Fee received 5/15/2019, in the amount of $35.08; receipt number 14626034496. (JS, ilcd)
April 25, 2019 Filing 7 Telephone WRIT issued for 5/23/2019 at 10:20 a.m. before Judge Baker. Copy of writ faxed to institution and original placed mail. (ED, ilcd)
April 25, 2019 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 4/25/19. A merit review hearing is set for May 23, 2019, at 10:20 a.m., by telephone conference call from Urbana. The clerk is directed to issue a writ to insure plaintiffs appearance at this merit review hearing.(ED, ilcd)
April 15, 2019 Filing 6 CORRECTED VERSION OF PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by Roosevelt Jackson.(ED, ilcd)
April 12, 2019 Filing 5 Exhibit regarding #1 Complaint by Roosevelt Jackson. (LN, ilcd)
April 10, 2019 Filing 4 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER. (LN, ilcd)
April 10, 2019 Filing 3 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Roosevelt Jackson. (LN, ilcd)
April 10, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Colin Stirling Bruce. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Rock Island Division, 131 E 4th Street, Davenport, IA 52801. Merit Review Deadline set for 4/30/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues) (LN, ilcd)
April 10, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all defendants, filed by Roosevelt Jackson. (LN, ilcd)
April 10, 2019 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER - Entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 4/10/2019 granting #3 Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $35.38. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to forward the initial partial filing fee from Plaintiff`s account to the Clerk of Court. After payment of the initial partial filing fee (or immediately if no funds are available for that payment) the agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month`s income credited to Plaintiff`s account to the Clerk of Court. Income includes all deposits from any source. The agency having custody of the plaintiff shall forward these payments each time Plaintiff`s account exceeds $10, until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff`s place of confinement, to the attention of the Trust Fund Office. (LN, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Hansen et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nurse Practitioner C. Hansen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A. Tilden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roosevelt Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?