Contreras v. Todd et al
| Milton Contreras |
| Todd, C Bolties and Steller |
| 1:2019cv01124 |
| April 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 5/16/2019. On April 11, 2019, the Court denied Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this case. Therein, the Court explained that Plaintiff's release from the IDOC may have an affect upon his request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, the Court gave Plaintiff twenty-one (21) days from the date of the Court's Order either to pay the filing fee or to move again for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and the Court provided Plaintiff with the appropriate forms to re-file his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis if that was his desire to do so. As of today, Plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee nor moved again for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. As a result, this case is dismissed, without prejudice, based upon Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's order by either paying the filing fee or moving for leave to proceed in forma paupers. This case is closed. No judgment to enter.(JMB, ilcd)
|
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 4/11/2019. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is DENIED with leave to re-file. Plaintiff indicated on his petition to proceed in forma pauperis that he was incarcerated. However, Plaintiff has since been released from the IDOC's custody. Plaintiff's release may have an affect on his request to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to send the appropriate form with which Plaintiff may move for in forma pauperis status. Plaintiff should complete this form accurately and truthfully and return the petition to the Court within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order. Plaintiff's failure to return this form or pay the filing fee within this time frame will result in the Court dismissing this case. (JMB, ilcd)
|
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 4/11/2019. Plaintiff's motion for counsel #5 is DENIED. The Court generally will not consider recruiting counsel for a pro se plaintiff until the Court determines that he possess a claim upon which relief can be granted after conducting a merit review of the complaint. In addition, Plaintiff is no longer in custody, and therefore, incarceration does not hamper his ability either to litigate this case or to find counsel on his own. (JMB, ilcd)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Milton Contreras. Responses due by 4/24/2019 (JMB, ilcd) |
| Filing 4 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER. by Milton Contreras (JMB, ilcd) |
| Filing 3 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Milton Contreras.(JMB, ilcd) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Colin Stirling Bruce. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Urbana Division, 201 S Vine Street, Urbana, IL 61802.Merit Review Deadline set for 4/30/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(JMB, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Milton Contreras. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JMB, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
