Harris v. Illinois State Police et al
| Durell Harris |
| B Johnson, Jeff Enderli, J Weber, David Freymann, Kristin E Canas, Ryan Albin, Illinois State Police, Chad Dumonceaux, Patrick Sorrells and Joe Dittmer |
| 1:2019cv01136 |
| April 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Michael M Mihm |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Letter from IDOC advising Plaintiff is no longer incarcerated. (SAG, ilcd) |
TEXT ORDER: The Court is in receipt of #8 , the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, dated 5/6/2019. On 4/30/2019, the Court entered an order determining that the Plaintiff's Petition to Proceed in forma pauperis was denied and his Complaint was dismissed. (D. #6 ). On 5/1/2019, judgment against the Plaintiff was entered and the Court further informed him that pursuant to Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997), the payment method specified in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) applies to any prisoner who seeks to proceed in forma pauperis, whether or not such status is granted. As such, the Court declines to take any action regarding the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Entered by Senior Judge Michael M. Mihm on 5/9/2019. (RT, ilcd)
|
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Durell Harris.(SAG, ilcd) |
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT entered in a civil case (SAG, ilcd) |
|
TEXT ORDER: On 4/30/2019, the Court entered an order determining that the Plaintiff's Petition to Proceed in forma pauperis was denied. (D. #6 ). Pursuant to Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997), the payment method specified in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) applies to any prisoner who seeks to proceed in forma pauperis, whether or not such status is granted. Therefore, the agency having custody of the Plaintiff is directed to remit the filing fee of $400.00 from his prison account if such funds are available. If he does not have $400.00 in his account, the agency is directed to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to the Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of the Court. Income includes all deposits from any source. The agency having custody of the Plaintiff shall forward these payments each time the Plaintiff's account exceeds $10, until the filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to the Plaintiff's place of confinement, to the attention of the Trust Fund Office. Entered by Senior Judge Michael M. Mihm on 5/1/2019. (RT, ilcd)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 4/30/2019. IT IS ORDERED: the Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis #2 is DENIED and his Complaint #1 is DISMISSED. This matter is hereby terminated. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER.(SAG, ilcd)
|
| Filing 5 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER. (SAG, ilcd) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of proposed Summons by Durell Harris (SAG, ilcd) |
| Filing 3 Letter from Clerk of Court to Pontiac CC Trust Fund Dept requesting trust fund ledgers 10/19/2018 through 4/19/2019 (SAG, ilcd) Modified on 4/25/2019 to correct typographical error (SAG, ilcd). |
| Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley no longer assigned to case. (SAG, ilcd) |
| Filing 2 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Durell Harris.(SAG, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Durell Harris.(SAG, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
