Short v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Stephen Short
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: CSS-Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2019cv01166
Filed: May 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Sara Darrow
Referring Judge: Jonathan E Hawley
2 Judge: James E Shadid
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 3, 2019 Filing 4 Return of Service Executed by Stephen Short as to Commissioner of Social Security. (ED, ilcd)
May 22, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Commissioner of Social Security served on 5/22/2019, answer due 9/19/2019. (Attachments: #1 complaint)(ED, ilcd)
May 21, 2019 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 5/21/2019 GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915. The Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis was submitted under penalty of perjury and sufficiently demonstrates that the Plaintiff should be excused from paying the filing fee in this action. It is ordered that the Clerk issue summons, and the United States Marshal serve a copy of the Complaint, summons, and this Text Order upon the Defendant in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i). All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. (WG, ilcd)
May 16, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Stephen Short. Responses due by 5/30/2019 (Dietzenbach, Jodee)
May 16, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Stephen Short. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons to AG of US, #3 Summons to Office of Regional Chief, #4 Summons to US Attorney)(Dietzenbach, Jodee)
May 16, 2019 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER: The Plaintiff filed the Complaint #1 in this case in the Peoria Division of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois, but it appears the Complaint should have been filed in the Rock Island Division. The Plaintiff resides in Galesburg, Knox County, Illinois which is in the Rock Island Division. Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to transfer this case to the Rock Island Division. See Local Rule 40.1. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 5/16/2019. (KZ, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Short v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: US ATTY-ROCK ISLAND SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephen Short
Represented By: Jodee R Dietzenbach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: CSS-Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?