Mir v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
| Jehan Zeb Mir |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Does 1-10, Michael Tipsord and Patrick Griffith |
| 1:2019cv01225 |
| June 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Jonathan E Hawley |
| Joe Billy McDade |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins added. (RK, ilcd) |
| Text Order of recusal. Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley disqualifies and recuses himself from participation in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S. C. 455(a). Pursuant to instructions from Chief Judge Sara Darrow, this matter is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins for further proceedings. Entered: 7/1/2019. (WG, ilcd) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Defendants Patrick Griffith, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Michael Tipsord. (RK, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR TORTUOUS BREACH OF INSURANCE CONTRACT; BREACH OF IMPLIED COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING; EXTRINSIC FRAUD; INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACT RIGHTS; CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE CIVIL RIGHTS against All Defendants, filed by Jehan Zeb Mir. (Attachments: #1 civil cover sheet)(RK, ilcd) Modified on 6/28/2019 to correct typo (RK, ilcd). |
| Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number 14626034762 (RK, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
