Cox v. Kallis
| Clinton D Cox |
| Steve Kallis and Frederick Entzel, Warden |
| 1:2019cv01292 |
| September 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Sara Darrow |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER AND OPINION entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on 10/07/2019. (RL, ilcd)
|
| Receipt #44626003657 for $5.00 paid for Filing fee as to Clinton Cox. (RL, ilcd) |
|
TEXT ORDER Entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on 9/9/2019. Petitioner has filed a Petition for Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. Petitioner is directed to either pay the $5 filing fee or provide the Court with a signed Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs that also includes a copy of his trust fund ledger, certified by the appropriate institutional officer, showing all receipts, expenditures and balances for the last six months. Petitioner shall do so on or before October 9, 2019, or the Court will dismiss the case without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee. The Clerk is directed to send Petitioner a copy of the forms for proceeding in forma pauperis.(ED, ilcd)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Clinton D Cox.(RL, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
