Samuel v. Hanshaw et al
Plaintiff: James A Samuel
Defendant: Benjamin C Hanshaw and Pro Health General Surgery
Case Number: 1:2019cv01314
Filed: September 23, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Colin Stirling Bruce
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2019 Filing 10 JUDGMENT entered. (KE, ilcd)
October 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 10/21/2019. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint #8 is DENIED because Plaintiff's proposed amended complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and, therefore, allowing Plaintiff to file his proposed amended complaint would be futile. This case is closed, and all pending motions are denied as moot. The Clerk is directed to enter a judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. See written order. (KE, ilcd)
October 16, 2019 Filing 8 Motion for Leave to file AMENDED COMPLAINT against Benjamin C Hanshaw, Pro Health General Surgery, filed by James A Samuel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Affidavit, #3 Envelope)(DS, ilcd) Modified on 10/16/2019 to correct title.(KE, ilcd).
October 15, 2019 Prisoner Initial Partial Filing Fee received 10/15/2019, in the amount of $ 14.03; receipt number 24626009013 (JMB, ilcd)
September 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 9/30/2019. Plaintiff's complaint is hereby dismissed with leave to plead over. The plaintiff may file an amended complaint, within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order, that complies with the Court's instructions above. If the plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint or fails to follow the Court's specific instructions, as outlined in this Order, this case may be dismissed. The Clerk of the court is directed to provide the plaintiff with a blank complaint form to assist her file an amended complaint. See written order. (Attachments: #1 Blank Complaint Form)(KE, ilcd)
September 24, 2019 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 9/24/2019. Plaintiff's motion to request counsel #5 is DENIED. The Court generally will not consider recruiting counsel for a pro se plaintiff until the Court determines that he possess a claim upon which relief can be granted after the Court conducts a merit review of the complaint. Plaintiff may renew his motion if his claim survives a merit review that the Court will conduct in the near future. (KE, ilcd)
September 23, 2019 Filing 6 Letter from Plaintiff regarding enclosed documents. (KE, ilcd)
September 23, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff James A Samuel. Responses due by 10/7/2019 (KE, ilcd)
September 23, 2019 Filing 4 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER by James A Samuel. (KE, ilcd)
September 23, 2019 Filing 3 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by James A Samuel.(KE, ilcd)
September 23, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Colin Stirling Bruce. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Urbana Division, 201 S Vine Street, Urbana, IL 61802.Merit Review Deadline set for 10/15/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(KE, ilcd)
September 23, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by James A Samuel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(KE, ilcd)
September 23, 2019 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 9/23/2019 granting #3 Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $14.03. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to forward the initial partial filing fee from Plaintiff`s account to the Clerk of Court. After payment of the initial partial filing fee (or immediately if no funds are available for that payment) the agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month`s income credited to Plaintiff`s account to the Clerk of Court. Income includes all deposits from any source. The agency having custody of the plaintiff shall forward these payments each time Plaintiff`s account exceeds $10, until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff`s place of confinement, to the attention of the Trust Fund Office. (KE, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Samuel v. Hanshaw et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Benjamin C Hanshaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pro Health General Surgery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James A Samuel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?