Vonderheide v. Commissioner of Social Security
Janet Lynne Vonderheide |
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Commissioner of Social Security |
CSS-Social Security Administration |
1:2019cv01325 |
October 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Jonathan E Hawley |
Michael M Mihm |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Janet Lynne Vonderheide. U.S. Attorney General served on 10/15/2019, answer due 2/12/2020. (Wombacher, William) Modified on 12/3/2019 to correct party served(RK, ilcd). |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Janet Lynne Vonderheide. Office of Regional Counsel served on 10/15/2019, answer due 2/12/2020. (Wombacher, William) Modified on 12/3/2019 to correct party served (RK, ilcd). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Returned to Plf to service on Defendants. (RK, ilcd) Modified on 12/3/2019 to correct party (RK, ilcd). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0753-3216042.), filed by Janet Lynne Vonderheide.(Wombacher, William) (Main Document 1 replaced on 10/10/2019) (RK, ilcd). (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/10/2019: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (RK, ilcd). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.