Littlefield v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Melissa Littlefield |
| Andrew M Saul and Commissioner of Social Security |
| CSS-Social Security Administration |
| 1:2019cv01345 |
| October 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Sara Darrow |
| Jonathan E Hawley |
| James E Shadid |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Melissa Littlefield. US Dept. of Justice, Office of the Attorney General on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security served on 12/10/2019, answer due 4/8/2020. (RK, ilcd) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued. (Attachments: #1 complaint)(ED, ilcd) |
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 11/21/2019 GRANTING #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915. The Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis was submitted under penalty of perjury and sufficiently demonstrates that the Plaintiff should be excused from paying the filing fee in this action. It is ordered that the Clerk issue summons, and the United States Marshal serve a copy of the Complaint, summons, and this Text Order upon the Defendant in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i). All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. (WG, ilcd)
|
| Filing 4 Second MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis per Court Order dated 10/30/2019 by Plaintiff Melissa Littlefield. Responses due by 12/4/2019 (Goetz, David) |
|
TEXT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley: The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis was submitted under penalty of perjury and is insufficient for the Court to determine Plaintiff's ability to pay the filing fee as the completion is vague due to minimal details. Plaintiff must either pay the filing fee or refile Form AO 239, under penalty of perjury by 12/2/2019. Entered on 10/30/2019. (WG, ilcd)
|
| Chief Judge Sara Darrow added. Judge James E. Shadid no longer assigned to case. (RK, ilcd) |
|
TEXT ORDER: The Plaintiff's Complaint #1 states that the Plaintiff is a resident of Knox County, Illinois. Knox County, Illinois is in the Central District of Illinois, and thus the Plaintiff correctly filed in this district pursuant to 20 C.F.R. 422.210(b). However, the Plaintiff filed this case in the Peoria Division of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois. Local Rule 40.1(C) provides that "All complaints and subsequent filings in cases which arise from the following counties:... Knox... will be filed at ROCK ISLAND, ILLINOIS." The Clerk is therefore directed to TRANSFER this case to the Rock Island Division of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 10/30/2019. (KZ, ilcd)
|
| Filing 3 +++ SEALED DOCUMENT - ORIGINAL MOTION TO PROCEED IFP UNREDACTED (RK, ilcd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Melissa Littlefield. Responses due by 11/12/2019 (RK, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M Saul, Acting Comm'r of Social Security, filed by Melissa Littlefield. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Summons, #3 Supplement Summons, #4 Supplement Summons, #5 Affidavit Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis)(Goetz, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
