Jones v. Brookhart
| Robert Jones |
| Warden Deanna Brookhart |
| Deanna Brookhart |
| Habeas Attorney General |
| 1:2020cv01128 |
| March 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 14626036737 (RK, ilcd) |
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 4/6/20 directing the Petitioner to pay the filing fee of $5.00 within 30 days of this Order. If Petitioner is unable to pay the required filing fee, he may file a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. If Petitioner fails to pay the required filing fee or file a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis within 30 days, his Petition under 28 U.S.C. section 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in State Custody #1 will be dismissed without prejudice by this court. (Miscellaneous Deadline 5/6/2020.) (KM, ilcd)
|
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus re #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.) by Robert Jones. (Zellner, Kathleen) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.), filed by Robert Jones. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Zellner, Kathleen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
