Geiler v. Commissioner of Social Security
Bethany A Geiler |
Commissioner of Social Security |
CSS-Social Security Administration |
1:2020cv01168 |
April 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Michael M Mihm |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42:402 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (VH, ilcd) |
![]() |
Filing 5 STRICKEN PURSUANT TO TEXT ORDER ENTERED ON 5/19/2020-NOTICE: Proposed summons (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(VH, ilcd) Modified on 5/19/2020 (VH, ilcd). |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 4 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Bethany A Geiler. Responses due by 5/26/2020 (VH, ilcd) |
Filing 3 STRICKEN PURSUANT TO TEXT ORDER ENTERED ON5/12/2020-NOTICE: Proposed Summons for Issuance. (VH, ilcd) Modified on 5/12/2020 (VH, ilcd). |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 14626036972 (FDS, ilcd) |
Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley no longer assigned to case. (VH, ilcd) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Bethany A Geiler. Responses due by 5/6/2020 (VH, ilcd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Bethany A Geiler. (Attachments: #1 Ex 1, #2 Ex 2, #3 Ex 3, #4 Ex 4, #5 Ex 5, #6 Ex 6)(VH, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.