Howard v. Austin et al
| Tina Howard |
| Shartyse Pumfrey, Glen Austin (Warden), Steven Meeks, Lisa Johnson, Megan Davlin, Celina Tsang, Glen Austin, Dr. Celina Tsang, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and Dr. Steven Meeks |
| 1:2020cv01171 |
| April 23, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Sara Darrow |
| Jonathan E Hawley |
| James E Shadid |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Kathryn Elizabeth Boyle on behalf of Glen Austin (Boyle, Kathryn) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Service/Counsel re #2 Waiver of Service Executed by Defendant Austin by Melinda Longford Power on behalf of Tina Howard (Power, Melinda) |
| Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Tina Howard. Glen Austin waiver sent on 4/27/2020, answer due 6/26/2020. (Power, Melinda) |
TEXT ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Chief Judge Sara Darrow and Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley for all further proceedings due to nature of the case. Judge James E. Shadid no longer assigned to case. Entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on 4/24/2020. (SAG, ilcd)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0753-3358125.), filed by Tina Howard. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Power, Melinda) Modified on 4/24/2020 to correct parties (RK, ilcd). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
