Holman v. Pritzker et al
Plaintiff: Richard Holman
Defendant: Rob Jeffreys and J B Pritzker
Case Number: 1:2020cv01334
Filed: September 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Sara Darrow
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2020 Filing 9 MOTION Requesting Court to Alter or Amend Its 10-20-20 Merit Review Order Judgment by Plaintiff Richard Holman. Responses due by 11/23/2020 (ANW, ilcd)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 10/26/2020. Plaintiff's Motion for Status #8 is GRANTED. The Court entered its Merit Review Order on October 20, 2020. (SAG, ilcd)
October 21, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION for status by Plaintiff Richard Holman. Responses due by 11/4/2020 (ANW, ilcd)
October 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MERIT REVIEW ORDER entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 10/20/2020. It is therefore ordered: 1. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the entry of this order to file an amended complaint to provide any additional information regarding an Eighth Amendment conditions-of- confinement claim he desires to provide. Failure to file an amended complaint will result in the dismissal of this case, without prejudice, for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff's amended complaint will replace Plaintiff's original complaint in its entirety. Accordingly, the amended complaint must contain all allegations against all Defendants. Piecemeal amendments are not accepted. 2. Plaintiff's motion for counsel #6 is denied, with leave to renew upon demonstrating that he made attempts to hire his own counsel. Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). This typically requires writing to several lawyers and attaching the responses. If Plaintiff renews his motion, he should set forth how far he has gone in school, any jobs he has held inside and outside of prison, any classes he has taken in prison, and any prior litigation experience he has. 3. Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction #5 is denied. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER.(SAG, ilcd)
September 24, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Chief Judge Sara Darrow. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Rock Island Division, 131 E 4th Street, Davenport, IA 52801. Merit Review Deadline set for 10/14/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(SAG, ilcd)
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER granting #3 Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $61.00. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to forward the initial partial filing fee from Plaintiff`s account to the Clerk of Court within 30 days of this order. After payment of the initial partial filing fee (or immediately if no funds are available for that payment) the agency having custody of Plaintiff shall make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court. Income includes all deposits from any source, including gifts. The agency having custody of the plaintiff shall forward these payments each time Plaintiff's account exceeds $10, until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. Plaintiff is ultimately responsible for ensuring that the initial partial filing fee and required monthly payments are made. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this case. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff's place of confinement, to the attention of the Trust Fund Office, and to Plaintiff. Entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on 9/24/2020. (SAG, ilcd)
September 23, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Richard Holman. Responses due by 10/7/2020 (SAG, ilcd)
September 23, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Richard Holman. Responses due by 10/7/2020 (SAG, ilcd)
September 23, 2020 Filing 4 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER. by Richard Holman (SAG, ilcd)
September 23, 2020 Filing 3 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Richard Holman.(SAG, ilcd)
September 23, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Richard Holman.(SAG, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Holman v. Pritzker et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Holman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rob Jeffreys
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J B Pritzker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?