Grayson v. Gillespie et al
| Breyon Grayson |
| Austin Gillespie and Tazewell County Sheriff Dept |
| 1:2020cv01348 |
| October 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Jonathan E Hawley |
| James E Shadid |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ORDER ONLY: Upon careful consideration of Plaintiff's Motion #5 for Reconsideration, the Court respectfully denies Plaintiff's request. The Court warns Plaintiff that further frivolous filings may lead to sanctions, including a filing bar. See Support Sys. Intl v. Mack , 45 F.3d 185 (7th Cir. 1995). Entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 11/5/2020. (GN2, ilcd)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Reconsideration re #3 Order by Plaintiff Breyon Grayson. Responses due by 11/16/2020 (VH, ilcd) |
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT entered. (VH, ilcd) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 10/20/2020. For the reasons set forth above, Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. 2) to proceed IFP is GRANTED, and this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate all pending motions and close the case. Case Terminated. See full written Order.(VH, ilcd)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Breyon Grayson. Responses due by 10/27/2020 (VH, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Breyon Grayson.(VH, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
