Scott v. Entzel
| Anthony Shane Scott |
| Warden Entzel |
| 1:2020cv01370 |
| October 27, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Sara Darrow |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Amend Petition by Petitioner Anthony Shane Scott. Responses due by 12/24/2020 (RES, ilcd) |
TEXT ORDER entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on 12/10/2020. Respondents Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal #8 is GRANTED for the reasons in the motion. Docket entry #9 shall remain under seal. (RES, ilcd)
|
| Filing 9 +++ SEALED DOCUMENT.. (Hodges, Grant) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to File Document Under Seal by Respondent Warden Entzel. Responses due by 12/23/2020 (Hodges, Grant) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Motion re #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Respondent Warden Entzel. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of K. Martin, #2 Appendix)(Hodges, Grant) |
| Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 14626039077 (SAG, ilcd) |
|
TEXT ORDER Entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on 11/16/20 Respondents Motion for Extension of Time #6 is GRANTED for the good cause stated in the Motion. Respondents response is now due on or before December 11, 2020. Petitioner may file a reply on or before January 4, 2021.(ANW, ilcd)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Petition by Respondent Warden Entzel. Responses due by 11/27/2020 (Hodges, Grant) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Substitute Attorney, W. Scott Simpson to be replaced by Grant Thomas Hodges, by Respondent Warden Entzel. Responses due by 11/17/2020 (Hodges, Grant) |
|
TEXT ORDER Entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on 11/3/2020. Respondents Motion to Substitute Attorney #5 is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to replace AUSA W. Scott Simpson with AUSA Grant Thomas Hodges as attorney of record for Respondent.(RES, ilcd)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on 10/30/20. See written Order. The Respondent is directed to file an answer, motion, or other response, within twenty-one (21) days after service of this Order. After Respondent has filed its response, Petitioner is ORDERED to file any traverse or reply to Respondents response within twenty-one (21) days after service of said response on him. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall serve upon Respondent, or, if appearance has been entered by counsel, upon its attorney, a copy of every further pleading or other document submitted for consideration by the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner immediately notify the Court of any change in his mailing address. (ED, ilcd)
|
|
TEXT ORDER Entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on 10/30/20.Petitioner has filed a Motion to Request Counsel #3 . Civil litigants have no constitutional or statutory right to counsel. Zarnes v. Rhodes, 64 F.3d 285, 288 (7th Cir. 1995). When confronted with a motion to appoint counsel, the court should ask whether the Petitioner has made efforts to obtain counsel and whether the Petitioner appears competent to litigate the case himself. Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654 (7th Cir. 2007). Here, Petitioner has not indicated that he has made any efforts to obtain counsel. At this time, the Court finds that Petitioners argument is not complex and Petitioner has clearly presented his argument in his Petition. There is nothing before the Court to suggest that he is not capable of adequately presenting his case. Petitioner has not stated that he suffers from any mental or physical disability that would impair his ability to represent himself. Overall, Petitioner appears quite competent to represent himself and do the necessary legal research and advance his claims on his own. The Court does take note of the severity of the COVID-19 outbreak at FCI Pekin, where Petitioner is incarcerated, and the resulting quarantine. At this time, however, it is unclear whether this outbreak will hinder Petitioners ability to advance his arguments. Accordingly, Petitioners Motion #3 is DENIED at this time (ED, ilcd)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Request Counsel by Petitioner Anthony Shane Scott. Responses due by 11/10/2020 (ANW, ilcd) |
| Filing 2 Letter from Petitioner Scott. (ANW, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Anthony Shane Scott. (Attachments: #1 Part 2 of Petition, #2 Envelope)(ANW, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Scott v. Entzel | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Anthony Shane Scott | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Entzel | |
| Represented By: | W. Scott Simpson |
| Represented By: | Grant Hodges |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
