Jackson v. Kennedy
| Roosevelt Jackson |
| City of Pontiac, Illinois, Teri Kennedy and Illinois America Water Company |
| 1:2020cv01392 |
| November 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| James E Shadid |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE: Correctness of Complaint filed by Roosevelt Jackson. (VH, ilcd) |
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 12/21/2020. Plaintiff filed his complaint on November 10, 2020, and a Merit Review Order was entered on December 9, 2020. #1 ; December 9, 2020, Merit Review Order. Plaintiff has now filed a motion to correct his complaint #8 . Plaintiff says he forgot to insert his own name at the top of the complaint and asks the clerk to correct this error. The Court has already identified Plaintiff and reviewed Defendants and claims. The motion is unnecessary. Therefore, the motion is denied as moot #8 . (SAG, ilcd)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Correct Complaint by Plaintiff Roosevelt Jackson. Responses due by 12/28/2020 (VH, ilcd) |
| Filing 7 REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to Teri Kennedy on 12/9/2020. (SAG, ilcd) |
|
Filing 6
HIPAA QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 12/9/2020. (SAG, ilcd)
|
|
Filing 5
MERIT REVIEW ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 12/9/2020. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO: 1) Dismiss Defendants City of Pontiac and Illinois American Water Company for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to by 28 U.S.C. 1915A; 2) Attempt service on Defendant pursuant to the standard procedures; 3) Set an internal court deadline 60 days from the entry of this order for the court to check on the status of service and enter scheduling deadlines; and 4) Enter the Court's standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER.(SAG, ilcd)
|
| Filing fee: $400.00, receipt number 14626039162. (JS, ilcd) |
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 11/16/2020. Plaintiff, a pro se prisoner, has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) #3 . However, Plaintiff's Trust Fund Ledgers demonstrate he currently has $649.67 in his account #4 . In addition, Plaintiff chose to spend $336.83 in the commissary on November 2, 2020, and then filed his lawsuit on November 10, 2020 #1 . Since Plaintiff's basic living expenses are provided, the Court finds he is not indigent. The motion to proceed IFP is denied #3 . Plaintiff must pay the full $400 filing fee within 21 days of this order. If Plaintiff fails to pay the fee, his case will be dismissed without prejudice.(SAG, ilcd)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge James Shadid. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Peoria Division, 100 NE Monroe Street, Peoria, IL 61602. Merit Review Deadline set for 12/2/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(SAG, ilcd) |
| Filing 4 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER. by Roosevelt Jackson (SAG, ilcd) |
| Filing 3 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Roosevelt Jackson.(SAG, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Roosevelt Jackson.(SAG, ilcd) (Main Document 1 replaced on 11/12/2020) (SAG, ilcd). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
