Daugherty v. The Federal Savings Bank
| Kimberly K Daugherty and Kim Daugherty |
| The Federal Savings Bank |
| 1:2020cv01393 |
| November 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Jonathan E Hawley |
| Joe Billy McDade |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1693 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by The Federal Savings Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D)(Hefter, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant The Federal Savings Bank. Responses due by 1/13/2021 (Hefter, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Daniel S Hefter on behalf of The Federal Savings Bank (Hefter, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and Summons served on The Federal Savings Bank on 12/03/2020, filed by Kim Daugherty. (Pioletti, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to The Federal Savings Bank. (JS, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Federal Savings Bank ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0753-3519585.), filed by Kimberly K Daugherty. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet)(Pioletti, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
