Graham v. Caterpillar
Plaintiff: Dion Graham
Defendant: Caterpillar
Case Number: 1:2020cv01400
Filed: November 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Jonathan E Hawley
Referring Judge: James E Shadid
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 32 JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION. (FDS)
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER & OPINION entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 9/13/22: The Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment #22 . The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. This case is now TERMINATED. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER. (FDS)
February 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Text ORDER granting #29 Motion to Vacate and Continue Final Pretrial Conference and Jury Trial Dates. Final pretrial conference and jury trial dates are vacated pending ruling on the Motion for Summary Judgment. Entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 2/3/2022. (CG)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 30 REPLY to Response to Motion re #22 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Caterpillar. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Smentek, Sharilee)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MOTION to Vacate and Continue Final Pretrial Conference and Jury Trial Dates by Defendant Caterpillar. Responses due by 2/2/2022 (Smentek, Sharilee)
January 11, 2022 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ORDER granting Unopposed #28 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply #22 MOTION for Summary Judgment . Defendant's Reply now due by 2/1/2022. Entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 1/11/2022. (SJP)
January 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 28 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply (DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT) by Defendant Caterpillar. Responses due by 1/24/2022 (Smentek, Sharilee)
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ORDER granting Unopposed #27 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: Motion For Summary Judgment, #22 MOTION for Summary Judgment . Replies due by 1/18/2022 (Court closed 1/17/2022). Entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 12/22/2021. (SJP)
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply In Support of Its Motion For Summary Judgment by Defendant Caterpillar. Responses due by 1/4/2022 (Smentek, Sharilee)
December 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 26 AMENDED - RESPONSE to Motion re #22 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Dion Graham. (FDS)
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ORDER: Plaintiff recently filed a Response #25 to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment which fails to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court's Local Rules. The most obvious deficiency in Plaintiff's Response is that it fails to respond to each numbered statement of fact in Defendant's Motion. See CDIL L.R. 7.1(D)(2). Failure to respond to any numbered fact in Defendant's Motion will be deemed an admission of that fact. CDIL L.R. 7.1(D)(2)(b)(6). The Court therefore grants Plaintiff until 12/21/2021 to file an amended response that conforms with the federal and local rules regarding summary judgment. Entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 12/6/2021. (SJP)
December 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 25 RESPONSE to Motion re #22 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Dion Graham. (FDS)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MEMORANDUM in Support re #22 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Caterpillar. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit)(Smentek, Sharilee)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 23 RULE 56 NOTICE entered re #22 MOTION for Summary Judgment . (JS)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendant Caterpillar. Responses due by 12/3/2021 (Smentek, Sharilee)
November 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 Verification of address by Dion Graham: Address is 5728 N. Autumn Ridge, Apt. C, Peoria, IL 61604. (FDS)
November 1, 2021 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER: The Court notes that mail the Clerk sent to the Plaintiff was returned by USPS as unable to forward because "no such number." See (Doc. #19 ). Pursuant to CDIL-LR 16.3(K), every pro se plaintiff must notify the Clerk of this Court in writing of any change of address during the entire pendency of his case. Accordingly, the Plaintiff is directed to provide an updated address by 11/15/2021. His failure to do so may result in dismissal of his case for failure to prosecute. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 11/1/2021. (KZ)
November 1, 2021 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER granting #20 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Dispositive Motions due by 11/12/2021. Final Pretrial Conference reset for 3/11/2022 at 10:00 AM and Jury Trial reset for 4/18/2022 at 9:00 AM, both hearings in Courtroom A in Peoria before Judge James E. Shadid. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 11/1/21. (WG)
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Dispositive Motion by Defendant Caterpillar. Responses due by 11/12/2021 (Smentek, Sharilee)
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 Mail Returned as Undeliverable, re 10/20/21 Text Order. Mail sent to Dion Graham. Postmark states Return to Sender. No Such Number. Unable to Forward. (FDS)
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ORDER granting Defendant's Unopposed Motion #18 To Extend Dispositive Motion Deadline. Dispositive motions are now due by 11/5/2021. Entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 10/20/2021. (SJP)
October 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Dispositive Motion (Unopposed) by Defendant Caterpillar. Responses due by 10/29/2021 (Smentek, Sharilee)
July 28, 2021 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER granting #17 unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Fact Discovery. Fact discovery deadline extended to 8/10/2021. All other deadlines remain as previously set. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 7/28/21. (WG)
July 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery [UNOPPOSED] by Defendant Caterpillar. Responses due by 8/10/2021 (Smentek, Sharilee)
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST pursuant to Local Rule 11.3 by Caterpillar. (Smentek, Sharilee)
March 8, 2021 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER denying #12 the Plaintiff's Motion in which he asks that the Court move this case forward and decline dismissal and asks to subpoena his union representative. First, no motion to dismiss this case is pending. Second, as the Defendant points out in its Response #15 , a discovery schedule is now in place so the case is moving forward. Finally, the Plaintiff must not file his discovery requests with the Court. The Plaintiff is reminded that he may utilize any of the discovery methods prescribed in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, subject to the same terms and conditions as any other civil litigant. Accordingly, the Plaintiff's Motion #12 is DENIED. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 3/8/2021. (KZ)
March 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 RESPONSE to Motion re #12 MOTION [FOR MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF] filed by Defendant Caterpillar. (Smentek, Sharilee)
February 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 TEXT ORDER by U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley: The Court adopts the Discovery Plan #13 . Discovery due by 9/7/21. Dispositive Motions due by 10/22/21. Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/24/22 at 3:00 PM and Jury Trial set for 3/28/22 at 9:00 AM, BOTH in Courtroom A before District Judge Shadid. Rule 16 conference set 2/26/21 at 10:00 AM is VACATED. Court stresses the importance of adhering to the schedule and procedures for requests to extend the schedule. The parties are expected to review Judge Hawleys Standing Order that was revised on 12/6/2018. Parties are reminded of their option to consent to proceed before US Magistrate Judge. See attached form. Parties are reminded of option of Court sponsored mediation/Settlement Conference. Counsel/Parties are reminded of the importance of appearing for hearings scheduled via telephone. Failure to appear will result in in-person appearances for all further proceedings. Entered: 2/24/2021. (WG, ilcd)
February 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 DISCOVERY PLAN - PROPOSED/Report of Rule 26(f)Planning Meeting by Caterpillar. (Smentek, Sharilee)
February 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION by Plaintiff Dion Graham. Responses due by 3/5/2021 (FDS, ilcd)
January 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 TEXT ORDER: This case is set for a Rule 16 scheduling conference before Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 2/26/21 at 10:00 AM via telephone. Counsel are to phone into conference by calling 571-353-2300, then enter 287753270#. Please announce your name each time prior to speaking unless the judge asks a question directly to you so that the speaker may be identified by all. A discovery plan pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(3) shall be filed on or before 2/23/21. The parties may, but are not required to, follow the format of the sample discovery plan set forth as Attachment A to the standing order attached to this text order. The Discovery Plan event may be found in the CM/ECF system within the other Documents category. All counsel must read and be familiar with the standing order attached to this text order prior to their Rule 26(f) planning meeting. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 1/26/2021. (WG, ilcd)
January 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Caterpillar.(Smentek, Sharilee)
December 17, 2020 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Dft Caterpillar answer due 1/25/2021. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 12/17/20. (WG, ilcd)
December 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT by Defendant Caterpillar. Responses due by 12/30/2020 (Smentek, Sharilee)
December 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Sharilee Kempa Smentek on behalf of Caterpillar (Smentek, Sharilee)
December 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Katherine F Mendez on behalf of Caterpillar (Mendez, Katherine)
December 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dion Graham. Caterpillar served on 12/3/2020, answer due 12/24/2020. (FDS, ilcd)
November 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable, re copy of docket sheet. Mail sent to Dion Graham at #6, 5728 N. Autumn Ridge Ct, Peoria, IL 61604. (ME, ilcd)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Caterpillar. (FDS, ilcd)
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ORDER: Plaintiff has filed a Motion #2 for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Court finds Plaintiff lacks sufficient resources to prepay the filing fee in this case, and therefore GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion #2 to Proceed in forma pauperis. It is further ordered that the Clerk issue summons and the United States Marshal serve a copy of the complaint, summons, and this Order upon the Defendant as directed by the Plaintiff. See28 U.S.C. 1915(d). All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States.Additionally, Plaintiff has filed a Motion #3 to Request Counsel. Although Plaintiff has no absolute right to counsel in his civil proceeding, he asks the Court to exercise its discretion to appoint counsel for him. See Merritt v. Faulkner , 697 F.2d 761, 763 (7th Cir. 1983). When confronted with a motion to appoint counsel, the court should ask whether the petitioner has made efforts to obtain counsel and whether the petitioner appears competent to litigate the case himself. Pruitt v. Mote , 503 F.3d 647, 654 (7th Cir.2007). In his motion for counsel, Plaintiff failed to complete the second paragraph and attach documentation. Therefore, Plaintiff's Motion #3 to Request Counsel is DENIED at this time. Plaintiff may renew his motion to request counsel after resubmitting his motion for appointment of counsel with the second paragraph completed and documentation attached. If Plaintiff renews his motion, Plaintiff must also complete the fourth paragraph. Entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 11/17/2020.(GN2, ilcd)
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Dion Graham. Responses due by 11/30/2020 (TK, ilcd)
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Dion Graham. Responses due by 11/30/2020 (TK, ilcd)
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Caterpillar, filed by Dion Graham.(TK, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Graham v. Caterpillar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Caterpillar
Represented By: Katherine F Mendez
Represented By: Sharilee Kempa Smentek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dion Graham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?