Bradford v. Minger et al
| Walter A Bradford |
| City of Eureka Illinois, Michael L Stroh, Gregory Minger, Matt Smith, Woodford County Sheriff, Unknown Employees of Woodford County and State of Illinois |
| 1:2020cv01460 |
| December 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Jonathan E Hawley |
| James E Shadid |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ONLY ORDER: granting Plaintiff's Motion #3 for Reconsideration re the Court's 2/1/21 Text Order. After conferring with the Clerk's office, the Court has determined that although the docket did not reflect it, Plaintiff did indeed pay the $402 filing fee in this case on 1/21/2021. The Court apologizes for any inconvenience this oversight may have caused Plaintiff. Therefore, the Court's 2/1/2021 Order is vacated, and this case is reinstated. Additionally, the Clerk is directed to forward Plaintiff a blank copy of the summons. Plaintiff must fill out the summons and return it to the Clerk for issuance. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(b). Plaintiff is reminded that he is responsible for having the summons and complaint served upon the Defendants within the time allowed by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c). Alternatively, Plaintiff may send a letter to the Defendants requesting that Defendants waive service of summons. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(1). The Clerk is directed to forward Plaintiff a blank copy of the notice of lawsuit and request for waiver of service form. If the Defendants do not waive service of summons, Plaintiff must serve the Defendants as set forth above. Entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 2/19/2021. (FDS, ilcd)
|
| Filing 4 Remark: Envelope received in Clerk's office mail on 2/10/2021. The envelope was completely sealed, but had nothing inside. (TK, ilcd) |
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Reconsideration re 2/1/21 Text Order (filed as Plaintiff's Notice of Motion for Relief from Order of This Court Made on 2/1/2021 by Judge James E. Shadid and Restoration to the Calendar Due to Error/Mistake Pursuant to FRCP 60(b)(1)(6) by Plaintiff Walter A Bradford. Responses due by 2/22/2021 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit/Exhibit)(FDS, ilcd)
|
| Filing 2 JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE. (FDS, ilcd) |
|
VACATED PURSUANT TO THE 2/19/21 TEXT ORDER: TEXT ONLY ORDER: On 1/4/2021, the Court entered an Order directing Plaintiff to either pay a filing fee or file a petition to proceed in forma pauperis by 1/25/2021, otherwise this case could be dismissed. To date, Plaintiff has failed to pay the fee or file an IFP petition. The Court further notes Plaintiff has previously filed a case in the Central District of Illinois that was dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Bradford v. City of Eureka Illinois et al., No. 1:20-cv-01274 (C.D. Ill. 2020). Therefore, the Court dismisses this case with prejudice. Fed. Civ. P. 41(b). The Clerk is directed to close this case. Entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 2/1/2021. (GN2, ilcd) Modified on 2/19/2021 (FDS, ilcd).
|
| Filing fee: $402, receipt number 14626039624. (JS, ilcd) |
|
TEXT ORDER: The Plaintiff has filed a Complaint #1 but has not paid the $402 filing fee nor filed a petition to proceed in forma pauperis. By 1/25/2021, the Plaintiff must pay the $402 filing fee in full or file a petition to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to comply without good cause may result in dismissal of this case. The Clerk is directed to send the Plaintiff the forms for proceeding in forma pauperis. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 1/4/2021. (KZ, ilcd)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Walter A Bradford.(FDS, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
