Hari v. Tilden et al
David Hari |
Jane Doe, Andrew Tilden, . Erhler, . Boland and Wexford Health Care Source Inc |
1:2021cv01038 |
January 27, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Sue E Myerscough |
Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by David Hari. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(SKN) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Plaintiff David Hari. Responses due by 3/12/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(SKN) |
Filing fee paid: $ 402.00, receipt number 24626009854. (KM, ilcd) |
Filing 5 Letter from David Hari regarding filing fee (Pontiac Trust Fund check #131020 for $402.00 enclosed with letter). (KM, ilcd) |
Filing 4 Letter from David Hari regarding payment of his filing fee. (TC, ilcd) |
|
Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Sue E Myerscough. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Springfield Division, 600 E Monroe, Springfield,IL 62701.Merit Review Deadline set for 2/16/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(KE, ilcd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by David Hari. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(KE, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.