Miller v. Jerry Erwin Associates LLC
| Katherine Miller |
| Jerry Erwin Associates LLC |
| 1:2021cv01043 |
| January 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Jonathan E Hawley |
| Eric I Long |
| James E Shadid |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Jerry Erwin Associates LLC, Amber Glen LLC, filed by Katherine Miller.(DS) |
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 4/19/2021. Plaintiff's unopposed Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint #8 is GRANTED. The Court directs the Clerk to file Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint [8-1] instanter. (DS)
|
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Katherine Miller. Responses due by 4/30/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Beaumont, William) |
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 2/22/2021. The unopposed Motion to Stay #7 is GRANTED. This case is stayed. All deadlines are vacated. The Court directs the parties to provide a status update on or before 6/14/21. The Court directs the Clerk to administratively close this case. See Thomas v. Wardell, 2020 WL 1042627, n. 3 (7th Cir. March 4, 2020) ("Administratively closing a case moves it to a court's inactive docket, while the court retains jurisdiction for purposes of future activities on the case.") The case will be reopened when the stay is lifted. (DS)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Stay Proceedings and Holds its Responsive Pleadings in Abeyance (UNOPPOSED) by Defendant Jerry Erwin Associates LLC. Responses due by 3/5/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Roman, Michael) |
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 2/17/21. Due to a conflict with the Court's calendar, the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 3/8/21 is RESCHEDULED to 3/11/21 at 10:15 AM in Courtroom B in Urbana before Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long. The parties' deadline to submit a proposed Rule 26(f) Plan is 3/5/21. (TC, ilcd)
|
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 2/4/2021. Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time #6 is GRANTED. Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to 2/19/21. (DS, ilcd)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Plead to Plaintiff's Complaint (UNOPPOSED) by Defendant Jerry Erwin Associates LLC. Responses due by 2/17/2021 (Roman, Michael) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Michael James Roman on behalf of Jerry Erwin Associates LLC (Roman, Michael) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 2/2/2021. Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 3/8/2021 at 10:45 AM in Courtroom B in Urbana before Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long. See written Order.(DS, ilcd)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Kenneth Daniel Walsh on behalf of Jerry Erwin Associates LLC (Walsh, Kenneth) |
|
TEXT ORDER: It appears the Defendant's counsel inadvertently filed the Notice of Removal #1 in the Peoria Division of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois. The caption of the Notice of Removal identifies the Urbana Division, and the underlying Class Action Complaint was filed in the Circuit Court of Champaign County, Illinois. Therefore, the Clerk is directed to TRANSFER this case to the Urbana Division of this Court. See CDIL-LR 40.1(D). Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 2/1/2021. (KZ, ilcd)
|
| Pursuant to 2/1/2021 Text Order transferring case to the Urbana Division: Judge Colin Stirling Bruce and Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long added to case; Judge James E. Shadid and Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley are no longer assigned to case. (KM, ilcd) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Mary A Smigielski on behalf of Jerry Erwin Associates LLC (Smigielski, Mary) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Champaign County, case number 20-L186 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0753-3579595), filed by Jerry Erwin Associates LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of Mary A. Smigielski, #2 Exhibit Declaration of Alisa Clark)(Smigielski, Mary) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/1/2021: #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (KM, ilcd). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Miller v. Jerry Erwin Associates LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jerry Erwin Associates LLC | |
| Represented By: | Mary A Smigielski |
| Represented By: | Michael James Roman |
| Represented By: | Kenneth Daniel Walsh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Katherine Miller | |
| Represented By: | William H Beaumont |
| Represented By: | Roberto L Costales |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
