Rodriguez v. DeLong et al
| Jorge Rodriguez |
| Cheryl Hansen, Wesley Young, Kyle DeLong, John Doe Officer #2, John Doe Officer #1 and Jane Doe Nurse |
| 1:2021cv01065 |
| February 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Jonathan E Hawley |
| Eric I Long |
| Joe Billy McDade |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Jorge Rodriguez. Kyle DeLong waiver sent on 2/22/2021, answer due 4/23/2021; Cheryl Hansen waiver sent on 2/22/2021, answer due 4/23/2021; Wesley Young waiver sent on 2/22/2021, answer due 4/23/2021. (Marsh, Jordan) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Jason Joseph Weigand on behalf of Kyle DeLong, Wesley Young (Weigand, Jason) |
TEXT ORDER entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on 2/23/2021. Case reassigned to Judge Colin Stirling Bruce and Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long for all further proceedings due to nature of the case. Judge Joe Billy McDade, Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley no longer assigned to case. (SAG)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0753-3595768.), filed by Jorge Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Marsh, Jordan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
