Reader v. Social Security Administration
| Connie Sue Reader |
| Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security |
| CSS-Social Security Administration |
| 1:2021cv01086 |
| March 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Jonathan E Hawley |
| Joe Billy McDade |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Lindsay Beyer Payne on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Payne, Lindsay) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (AH) |
| Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley no longer assigned to case. (AEM) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Roger Lee Carter on behalf of Connie Sue Reader (TK) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST pursuant to Local Rule 11.3 by Connie Sue Reader. (TK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT 21-1086 against Social Security Administration ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0753-3607621.), filed by Connie Sue Reader. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet civil cover sheet attach, #2 Supplement disclosure, #3 Exhibit appearance, #4 Exhibit summons, #5 Exhibit civil cover)(Carter, Roger) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
