Triplett v. Saul, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Arricka C. Triplett
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: CSS-Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2021cv01115
Filed: April 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Jonathan E Hawley
Referring Judge: James E Shadid
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Lindsay Beyer Payne on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Payne, Lindsay)
April 20, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Commissioner of Social Security served on 4/20/2021, answer due 8/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 summons, #2 summons)(AEM)
April 16, 2021 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 4/16/2021 GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915. The Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis was submitted under penalty of perjury and sufficiently demonstrates that the Plaintiff should be excused from paying the filing fee in this action. It is ordered that the Clerk issue summons, and the United States Marshal serve a copy of the Complaint, summons, and this Text Order upon the Defendant in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i). All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. (WG, ilcd)
April 15, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Matthew Frederick Richter on behalf of Arricka C. Triplett (Richter, Matthew)
April 15, 2021 Filing 2 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Arricka C. Triplett. Responses due by 4/29/2021 (Richter, Matthew)
April 15, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Arricka C. Triplett. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons- U.S. Attorney General, #3 Summons- U.S. Attorney C.D. ILL, #4 Summons- SSA OGC, #5 USM 285- U.S. Attorney General, #6 USM 285- U.S. Attorney C.D. ILL, #7 USM 285- SSA OGC)(Richter, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Triplett v. Saul, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: US ATTY-PEORIA SSA
Represented By: Lindsay Beyer Payne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arricka C. Triplett
Represented By: Matthew Frederick Richter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: CSS-Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?