Smith v. Jeffreys et al
| Paul Smith |
| Rob Jeffreys, S Obaisi, L Schicker, L Williams, A Tilben, R Ojelade, C Hansen, J Caruso, S Mara, A Burchardt, S Bowman, S Godinez, J Baldwin, S Nwalbasi, . Larson, . Shearing, K Criss, John Does 1-5, Wexford Health Sources Inc, P Quinn, B Rauner and JB Pritzker |
| 1:2021cv01236 |
| August 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Sue E Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Letter from Plaintiff regarding filing fee. (KE) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to Pay Filing Fee by Plaintiff Paul Smith. Responses due by 9/24/2021 (KE) |
| Filing 10 Letter from Plaintiff regarding filing fee. (KE) |
| Prisoner Initial Partial Filing Fee received 9/3/2021, in the amount of $ 52.00; receipt number 24626010206. (BMG) |
| Filing 9 Remark: Notice emailed to the NDIL. (KE) |
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 8/23/2021. Plaintiff has filed a Complaint but has not paid the $402 filing fee nor filed a petition to proceed in forma pauperis. Within 21 days of the entry of this order, Plaintiff must pay the $402 filing fee in full or file a petition to proceed in forma pauperis with attached trust fund ledgers for the last 6 months. Failure to comply without good cause will result in dismissal of this case without prejudice, and the Plaintiff will still be responsible for payment of the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1914. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff the forms for proceeding in forma pauperis. (KE)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Sue E Myerscough. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Urbana Division, 201 S Vine Street, Urbana, IL 61802.Merit Review Deadline set for 9/13/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(KE) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Illinois Northern; Case Number 1:21-cv-04129. . |
| Filing 5 TRANSFERRED to the USDC Central District of Illinois, Urbana the electronic record. (kl, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: The Clerk is directed to transfer this case forthwith to the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois at Urbana for resolution of Plaintiff's filing fee issues and whatever other action the transferee court deems appropriate. The Court notes that Plaintiff has "struck out" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) and was informed as such by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. See Smith v. Pender,. No. 09-4155 (7th Cir. Apr. 22, 2010). The Clerk shall not issue summonses unless the transferee court so directs. The case and all pending motions #3 are terminated on this Court's docket. Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 8/23/2021. Mailed notice. (kl, )
|
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (kl, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION by Plaintiff Paul Smith for attorney representation. (Exhibits) (daj, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (daj, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and zero copies by Paul Smith (daj, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (daj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
