Cruz v. Ditto Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Sherry Cruz
Defendant: Ditto Technologies, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv01252
Filed: September 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Jonathan E Hawley
Referring Judge: Joe Billy McDade
2 Judge: Sue E Myerscough
3 Judge: Tom Schanzle-Haskins
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2021 Remark: This case has been opened in the NDIL as case 1:21-cv-05989. (TK)
November 8, 2021 Notice of Docket Text or Event Modification re #6 Notice of Appearance of Attorney: Document originally filed as a fillable PDF. Document printed to Adobe and replaced. (MJC)
November 5, 2021 Case transferred to the Northern District of Illinois. (MJC)
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER: Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation to Transfer Venue (d/e #10 ) filed by both parties, this case is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of Illinois. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 11/5/2021. (MJC)
November 3, 2021 Filing 10 STIPULATION to Transfer - filed Jointly by Sherry Cruz.. (Florek, Adam)
October 15, 2021 TEXT ORDER by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Defendant Ditto Technologies, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to Exceed Page Limit #9 is ALLOWED. Plaintiff has no objection. Defendant's Memorandum of Law #8 is deemed properly filed. Entered on 10/15/2021. (MJC)
October 12, 2021 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages (Unopposed) by Defendant Ditto Technologies, Inc.. Responses due by 10/26/2021 (Siebert, Melissa)
October 12, 2021 Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support re #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant Ditto Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Warga Declaration, #2 Exhibit B - Cruz v EyeBuy Direct Class Action Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Cruz v Glasses USA Class Action Complaint, #4 Exhibit D - Cruz v Ulta Beauty Class Action Complaint, #5 Exhibit E - Cruz v MAC Class Action Complaint, #6 Exhibit F - Cruz v Zenni Optical Class Action Complaint, #7 Exhibit G - Zenni Pleading, #8 Exhibit H - Vo v VSP)(Siebert, Melissa)
October 12, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Ditto Technologies, Inc.. Responses due by 10/26/2021 (Siebert, Melissa)
September 24, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Adam John Florek on behalf of Sherry Cruz (Florek, Adam)
September 15, 2021 Notice of Docket Text or Event Modification re #3 Notice of Appearance of Attorney: Document replaced with correct adobe format. Notice of Appearance filed by Attorney was a fillable adobe format. (ME)
September 9, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (Unopposed) by Defendant Ditto Technologies, Inc.. Responses due by 9/23/2021 (Siebert, Melissa)
September 9, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST pursuant to Local Rule 11.3 and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ditto Technologies, Inc.. (Siebert, Melissa)
September 9, 2021 TEXT ORDER by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Notice of Removal filed 9/3/2021 reviewed. Plaintiff is given to 10/3/2021 to file objections and a motion to remand. Failure to do so is deemed to mean Plaintiff has no legal opposition to removal and this case may proceed in this court. Further, Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #5 is ALLOWED. Defendant is granted an extension to 10/12/2021 to answer or otherwise plead. (LB)
September 8, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Brandon Michael Wise on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Wise, Brandon) (Main Document 3 replaced on 9/15/2021) (ME). (Main Document 3 replaced on 9/15/2021) (ME).
September 7, 2021 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 9/7/2021. The Notice of Removal indicates this cause of action was removed from the state circuit court located in Sangamon County, Illinois, which is located in the Springfield Division of this District. The Clerk is thus directed to transfer this case to the Springfield Division. (EWL)
September 3, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Melissa A Siebert on behalf of Ditto Technologies, Inc. (Siebert, Melissa)
September 3, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Sangamon County, case number 2021L000105 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILCDC-3750427), filed by Ditto Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court File, #2 Exhibit 2 - VSP's MTD, #3 Exhibit 3 (Part 1) - Cruz v. Zenni Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit 3 (Part 2) - Cruz v. Zenni Notice of Removal, #5 Exhibit 4 - Declaration, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Siebert, Melissa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cruz v. Ditto Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sherry Cruz
Represented By: Brandon Michael Wise
Represented By: Adam John Florek
Represented By: Paul A Lesko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ditto Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Melissa A Siebert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?