Hawkins v. Segal
Robert A. Hawkins |
Warden Segal |
1:2021cv01279 |
October 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
James E Shadid |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Petitioner Robert A. Hawkins. Responses due by 12/15/2021 (AH) |
TEXT ORDER: The Court GRANTS #7 Petitioners Motion for Extension of Time to File a Reply for good cause as stated in the motion. Petitioners reply is now due on or before December 30, 2021. Petitioner also indicates that he still has not received a copy of Respondents response. Respondent is DIRECTED to send Petitioner a copy of its Response and appendix on or before December 3, 2021. Entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 12/1/2021. (AH) |
TEXT ORDER: The Court GRANTS #5 Respondents Motion to Seal for good cause as stated in the motion. Docket entry #6 shall remain under seal. Entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 11/16/2021. (AH) |
Filing 6 +++ SEALED DOCUMENT.. (Simpson, W.) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Seal (Sealed Appendix to Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus) by Respondent Warden Segal. Responses due by 11/29/2021 (Simpson, W.) |
Filing 4 Appendix re #3 Response to Motion (Appendix to Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus) by Warden Segal. (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3)(Simpson, W.) |
Filing 3 RESPONSE to Motion re #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Respondent Warden Segal. (Simpson, W.) |
Filing 2 ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 10/25/2021. (AH) |
Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number 14626041797. (JS) |
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 10/7/2021. Petitioner Hawkins has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 #1 but has not paid the associated $5 filing fee. Petitioner is DIRECTED to either pay the $5 filing fee or provide the Court with a signed Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs that also includes a copy of his trust fund ledger, certified by the appropriate institutional officer, showing all receipts, expenditures and balances for the last six months. Petitioner shall do so on or before November 8, 2021, or the Court will dismiss the case without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Petitioner a copy of the forms for proceeding in forma pauperis.(JS) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, filed by Robert A. Hawkins.(AH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hawkins v. Segal | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Robert A. Hawkins | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden Segal | |
Represented By: | W. Scott Simpson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.