Turk v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Cindy L. Turk
Defendant: Comm'r of SSA Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: CSS-Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2022cv01015
Filed: January 20, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Jonathan E Hawley
Referring Judge: James E Shadid
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2022 Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by Cindy L. Turk as to Commissioner of Social Security 2/14/2022. (AEM)
January 21, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(AEM)
January 20, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Matthew Frederick Richter on behalf of Cindy L. Turk (Richter, Matthew)
January 20, 2022 Filing 2 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Cindy L. Turk. Responses due by 2/3/2022 (Richter, Matthew)
January 20, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi, filed by Cindy L. Turk. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons- U.S. Attorney General, #3 Summons- U.S. Attorney C.D. ILL, #4 Summons- SSA OGC, #5 USM 285- U.S. Attorney General, #6 USM 285- U.S. Attorney C.D. ILL, #7 USM 285- SSA OGC)(Richter, Matthew)
January 20, 2022 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 1/20/2022 GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915. The Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis was submitted under penalty of perjury and sufficiently demonstrates that the Plaintiff should be excused from paying the filing fee in this action. It is ordered that the Clerk issue summons, and the United States Marshal serve a copy of the Complaint, summons, and this Text Order upon the Defendant in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i). All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. (WG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Turk v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cindy L. Turk
Represented By: Matthew Frederick Richter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Comm'r of SSA Kilolo Kijakazi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: US ATTY-PEORIA SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: CSS-Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?