Divinely Nectar, Inc v. Destihl Brewery, LLC
Plaintiff: Divinely Nectar, Inc and Divinely Nector, Inc.
Defendant: Destihl Brewery, Inc and Destihl Brewery, LLC
Case Number: 1:2022cv01018
Filed: January 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Jonathan E Hawley
Referring Judge: James E Shadid
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2022 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to respond to #4 Amended Complaint. Dft Destihl Brewery, LLC answer due 4/13/2022. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 3/14/22. (WG)
March 11, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 Amended Complaint or Other Responsive Pleading by Defendant Destihl Brewery, LLC. Responses due by 3/25/2022 (Lubben, David)
March 11, 2022 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST pursuant to Local Rule 11.3 by Destihl Brewery, LLC. (Lubben, David)
March 11, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by David G Lubben on behalf of Destihl Brewery, LLC (Lubben, David)
February 7, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Destihl Brewery, LLC. (VH)
February 4, 2022 Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Destihl Brewery, LLC, filed by Divinely Nector, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Klaus, Richard)
January 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER re subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff is directed to file an Amended Complaint within 14 days of this date that adequately alleges the factual basis for this Court's jurisdiction. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 1/24/2022. (KZ) Modified on 1/25/2022 (AH).
January 21, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Richard P Klaus on behalf of Divinely Nectar, Inc (Klaus, Richard)
January 21, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILCDC-3850710.), filed by Divinely Nectar, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(Klaus, Richard)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Divinely Nectar, Inc v. Destihl Brewery, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Divinely Nectar, Inc
Represented By: Richard P Klaus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Divinely Nector, Inc.
Represented By: Richard P Klaus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Destihl Brewery, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Destihl Brewery, LLC
Represented By: David G Lubben
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?